Relational Logistic Regression: The Directed Analog of Markov Logic Networks
By Seyed Mehran Kazemi, David Buchman, Kristian Kersting, Sriraam Natarajan, David Poole. 2014
29 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Luc De Raedt
- Seyed Mehran Kazemi
- David Poole
- Sriraam Natarajan
- Angelika Kimmig
- Sebastijan Dumancic
- Kristian Kersting
- Robin Manhaeve
Citations in the corpus
- DeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming (2018, methodology): “[51] treat symbolic rules expressed in first-order logic as a template for constructing a neural network, while Kazemi and Poole [52] compose a relational neural network by adding hidden layers to relational logistic regression [53].”
- Structure learning for relational logistic regression: an ensemble approach (2018, methodology): “We consider the more recent, well-understood directed model of Relational Logistic Regression (RLR) (Kazemi et al. 2014a; Kazemi et al. 2014b; Fatemi, Kazemi, and Poole 2016).”
- Diachronic Embedding for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion (2019, background): “StaRAI: Statistical relational AI (StaRAI) [50, 31] approaches are mainly based on soft (hanf-crafted or learned) rules [51, 11, 29, 26] where the probability of a world is typically proportional to the number of rules that are satisfied/violated in that world and the confidence for each rule.”
- Relational Representation Learning for Dynamic (Knowledge) Graphs: A Survey (2019, unknown): “ models. Examples include Markov logic networks (Richardson and Domingos (2006)), Problog (De Raedt et al. (2007)), probabilistic soft logic (Kimmig et al. (2012)) and relational logistic regression (Kazemi et al. (2014)). These models typically use soft rules such as: <w: Friends(x;y) ^Friends(y”