Debugging Neural Machine Translations
By Matīss Rikters. 2018
5 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this paper, we describe a tool for debugging the output and attention weights of neural machine translation (NMT) systems and for improved estimations of confidence about the output based on the attention. The purpose of the tool is to help researchers and developers find weak and faulty example translations that their NMT systems produce without the need for reference translations. Our tool also includes an option to directly compare translation outputs from two different NMT engines or experiments. In addition, we present a demo website of our tool with examples of good and bad translations: this http URL
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Translation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yonatan Belinkov
- James R. Glass
- Felix Stahlberg
- Nadir Durrani
- Hassan Sajjad
- Fahim Dalvi
- Percy Liang
- Wei-Ning Hsu
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Yonatan Belinkov
- James R. Glass
- Felix Stahlberg
- David F. Harwath
- Hassan Sajjad
- Fahim Dalvi
- Nadir Durrani
- Wei-Ning Hsu
In Machine Translation
Citations in the corpus
- Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey (2018, methodology): “Another tool focused on comparing attention alignments was proposed by Rikters (2018).”
- Neural Machine Translation: A Review (2019, background): “The only work on confidence in NMT we are aware of is from Rikters and Fishel [372], Rikters [373] who aim to use attention to estimate word-level confidences.”