Deconstructing and unpacking scientific controversies in intensification and sustainability: why the tensions in concepts and values?

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: Is blended sustainability the way forward? (2018, background): “Gliessman (2014); Tittonell (2014); Struik et al. (2014); Struik and Kuyper (2014).”
Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review (2017, background): “Struik et al. (2014) also considered it necessary to introduce norms and values in the debate and conceptualized sustainable intensification not as a technological process but as “a process of social negotiation, institutional innovation and adaptive management”.”
Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability (2016, background): “There is a well-documented debate (Garnett and Godfray 2012; Kuyper and Struik 2014) on what constitutes sustainable intensification of agriculture (SIA) (Garnett et al. 2013; Godfray and Garnett 2014; Struik et al. 2014), its evolution (Kuyper and Struik 2014; Struik et al.”
Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems in the Central African Highlands: The need for institutional innovation (2016, background): “That this also applies to sustainable intensification is emphasised by Tittonell (2014) and Struik et al. (2014c) who underline that ‘sustainable intensification’ is likely to have different meaning for different groups of stakeholders.”