EM-DD: An Improved Multiple-Instance Learning Technique
By Sally A. Goldman. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2001
761 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb98ba3aa910e0ea4bd16c755832a086dc2bb2a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Zhi-Hua Zhou
- Dacheng Tao
- Chunhua Shen
- Han-Jia Ye
- Yi Yang
- Kristen Grauman
- Yoshua Bengio
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- Revisiting Multiple-Instance Learning Via Embedded Instance Selection (2008, methodology): “Since then, many other MI learning algorithms have been proposed (see, for example, [1], [2], [10], [12], [14], [24], [25], [27], [28], [29], [30]).”
- A review of multi-instance learning assumptions (2010, methodology): “A refinement of this algorithm, expectation maximization (EM)-diverse density (DD), was proposed by Zhang and Goldman (2001).”
- MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection (2006, methodology): “Zhang and Goldman [61] combined the idea of expectation-maximization (EM) with DD and developed an algorithm, EM-DD, to search for the most likely concept.”
- Image Categorization by Learning and Reasoning with Regions (2004, methodology): “The EM-DD result cited in this paper is provide by Andrews et al. (2003) using the correct algorithm.”
- A Multiple Instance Learning Strategy for Combating Good Word Attacks on Spam Filters (2008, methodology): “EM-DD combines EM with the DD algorithm to reduce the multiple instance learning problem to a single-instance setting.”
- Multiple-instance ranking: Learning to rank images for image retrieval (2008, methodology): “This problem has been studied by a lot of researchers and many algorithms have been developed, such as Diverse Density [18], EM-DD [24], MI- SVM and mi-SVM [2].”
- Multiple Instance Learning: Algorithms and Applications (2008, methodology): “The EM-DD [22] algorithm uses the same cost function as the above, but the optimization technique is different.”
- Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications (2016, methodology): “As discussed in Section 6.3, some methods are optimized for bag classification (EM-DD, MI-SVM, MILES, MILBoost, RSIS-EoSVM).”
- Multiple instance ranking (2008, background): “Algorithms for MIC stem from diverse density(Maron&Ratan, 1998; Zhang & Goldman, 2001), neural networks (Ramon & Figure 2.”
- Machine Learning and Radiology (2012, methodology): “This algorithm was improved by incorporating expectation maximization (EM) to estimate which instance(s) in a bag is responsible for the assigned class label (Zhang and Goldman, 2001).”
- Multi-instance multi-label learning (2008, methodology): “To name a few, Diverse Density [45] and Em-dd [83], k-nearest neighbor algorithms Citation-knn and Bayesian-knn [67], decision tree algorithms Relic [54] and Miti [9], neural network algorithms Bp-mip and extensions [77,90] and Rbf-mip [78], rule learning algorithm Ripper-mi [20], support vector mac”
- Weakly Supervised Action Detection (2011, methodology): “However, these methods either iteratively select positive instances locally [11, 19] (that is, each positive instance is selected independently of each other), or select the positive instances globally (by considering only the distances between positive and negative instances).”
- Multiple instance learning with generalized support vector machines (2002, background): “, [8, 12]) have focused on specially tailored machine learning algorithms that do not compare favorably in the limiting case of bags of size 1 (the standard classification setting).”
- Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis (2017, methodology): “Specifically, we first segment the brain into three different tissue types, i.e. , gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), using FAST ( Zhang et al., 2001 ) in the FSL software package.”
- Multiple instance learning for soft bags via top instances (2015, unknown): “EM-DD [28] 84.”
- Multi-Instance Kernels (2002, methodology): “While EM-DD (Zhang & Goldman, 2002) is superior on both datasets, among the algorithms that are based on general purpose learning methods, SVMs with MI kernels outperform all other methods.”