Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
By N. Campbell, E. Murray, J. Darbyshire, J. Emery, A. Farmer, F. Griffiths, B. Guthrie, H. Lester, P. Wilson, A. Kinmonth. British medical journal, 2007
1,327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb985744524727dd8f6554cd41d21bb726a7808b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Towards a general theory of implementation (2013, methodology): “Throughout what follows, the term ‘complex intervention’ is therefore used to define the object of any implementation process [11-13].”
- Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011, background): “The interventions may have been poorly developed, lacking appropriate theoretical basis and subsequent components to impact on the measured outcome domains [82,83].”
- Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation (2008, background): “The distinction between the two approaches (complex interventions versus complex systems) is easily blurred because they share common features—for example, non-standardisation, multiplicity, interactions. Analysts working with complex interventions, for example, also recognise the importance of cont”
- The role of assessment in competency-based medical education (2010, background): “‘‘Realistic evaluation’’ and the (UK) Medical Research Council’s strategy on studying complex interventions are two models that warrant attention for medical education research (Pawson & Tilley 1997; Campbell et al. 2007).”
- “Many miles to go …”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice (2013, methodology): “More use could have been made of developments in the evaluation of complex interventions [49], implementation, and evaluation studies [50].”
- IDEAS (Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share): A Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the Development of More Effective Digital Interventions to Change Health Behavior (2016, background): “Behavioral theory is widely acknowledged to be critical to the development of interventions to change health behavior [1-3,17-19] and increasing evidence suggests that health interventions grounded in theory are more effective than those without such theoretical foundations [19].”
- Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014, neutral): “…of theory is advocated as an integral step in intervention design and evaluation and in evidence synthesis, for example, by the UK Medical Research Council’s guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions (Campbell et al., 2000, 2007; Craig et al., 2008; Glanz & Bishop, 2010).”
- Implementation, context and complexity (2016, background): “Complex Interventions assertion of the many ‘moving parts’ in complex interventions [31, 32], structured attempts have been made to accommodate both complexity and emergence in context and to develop ways”
- Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions (2014, background): “The MRC guidance calls for more detailed and standardized descriptions of complex interventions in published reports to facilitate exchange of knowledge and to encourage synthesis of results from similar studies [1,32].”
- From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques (2008, background): “In considering the key tasks in optimising an intervention, Campbell et al. (2007) do not even refer to the theory-base identified in conceptualising the target problem.”