The Internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review

By A. Beech, I. Elliott, A. Birgden, Donald Findlater. 2008

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb8b8c56287f808f000df7a2586c0aadc625e18a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Michael C. Seto
2. A. Beech
3. I. Elliott
4. J. McCarthy
5. Tony Ward
6. D. Thornton
7. Theresa A. Gannon
8. Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

In Gender Studies

1. J. McCarthy
2. Michael C. Seto
3. I. Elliott
4. A. Beech

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael C. Seto
2. I. Elliott
3. A. Beech
4. J. McCarthy
5. Rebecca Williams
6. Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

Citations in the corpus

• Internet sexual activity: A comparison between contact and non-contact child pornography offenders (2010, background): “It is well documented that sex offenders use the internet to groom and meet potential victims, as well as network with others who share similar deviant sexual interests (Beech et al., 2008; Burke et al., 2002; Krone, 2004; O’Connell, 2001; Sheldon & Howitt, 2007; Taylor & Quayle, 2003).”
• Identifying Sexual Grooming Themes Used by Internet Sex Offenders (2013, background): “The increase in the number of sex offenses linked to Internet use has led to an increase in society’s awareness of how the Internet is used to groom victims (Beech et al. 2008).”
• Explanations given by child pornography offenders for their crimes (2010, background): “We were not able to examine all the explanations suggested by Lanning (1992), Quayle and Taylor (2002) or Beech et al. (2008).”