Social Capital in Transition: A First Look at the Evidence*
By Claire D. Wallace, M. Raiser, C. Haerpfer. 2002
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper provides what we believe to be the first collection of data on social capital in the transition countries of Central/Eastern Europe and of the former Soviet Union. Using data from the World Values Survey 1990 and 1995 we document the de- gree of trust and of civic participation and find that these indicators of social capital are significantly lower than in OECD countries. The paper also provides a preliminary in- vestigation of the link between social capital and growth during transition. Unlike in market economies, in transition countries trust is not positively related to growth; while participation in civic organisations shows a positive correlation. We also construct in- dicators of trust in public institutions and find positive correlations with growth rates. The positive association of civic participation with growth is robust to the use of in- strumental variable techniques to control for potential problems of endogeneity. Sociologický casopis/Czech Sociological Review, 2002, Vol. 38, No. 6: 693-720
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb772cadb699030f8a39d9ff4492d431e10ec787
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Fabio Sabatini
- Bat Batjargal
- Friederike Welter
- Julie Juan Li
- Ha Hoang
- Frane Adam
- An Yi
- Hans Westlund
Citations in the corpus
- Network triads: transitivity, referral and venture capital decisions in China and Russia (2007, background): “Interpersonal trust is higher in China than in Russia, because the institutional stability prevalent in China provides favorable conditions for relatively trustworthy behavior of actors (Raiser et al, 2001).”
- The Empirics of Social Capital and Economic Development: A Critical Perspective (2005, methodology): “include items very similar to those elaborated by the Istat and adopted in Sabatini (2005b). In particular, significant progress in this direction has been recently carried out in Australia (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004), the United Kingdom (National Statistics, 2001 and 2003, Harper and Ke”