Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product
By S. Chan, R. Bindlish, P. O’neill, Eni G. Njoku, Thomas J. Jackson, A. Colliander, Fan Chen, M. Burgin, R. Dunbar, J. Piepmeier and 24 more. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016
552 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb6af197ece5dc2c496a25fb7531cc9969af8c41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Global Soil Moisture Monitoring With Sentinel-1: Harnessing Assets and Overcoming Obstacles (2019, background): “Remotely sensed soil moisture data from Metop Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) [25], Windsat [26], Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) [27], and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) [28] have been thoroughly evaluated and found widespread use [29], [30].”
- Coupling between the terrestrial carbon and water cycles—a review (2019, unknown): “Microwave remote sensing can be used to retrieve surface soil moisture (Barre et al 2008, Entekhabi et al 2010, Kolassa and Aires 2012, Chan et al 2016, Kolassa et al 2016, Colliander et al 2017, Dorigo et al 2017, Kolassa et al 2017a, 2017b) as well as to place constraints on vegetation hydraulic…”