Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems

By D. Lonzarich. 2004

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐ II. Using hypothesis development and testing in design, Mokelumne river, California, U.S.A. (2004, background): “Yet ‘active approaches’ are chosen in place of ‘passive approaches’ when river managers decide that a ‘passive approach’ will take an unacceptably long amount of time (Montgomery and Bolton, 2003).”
Biological Impacts of the Elwha River Dams and Potential Salmonid Responses to Dam Removal (2008, background): “These relatively high densities were associated with logjams, as the mean density of 0.05 fish/m2 in logjams was an order of magnitude higher than the mean density in non-logjam locations (0.005 fish/m2) (Pess et al. 2003a).”
Pacific Rim Population Structure of Chinook Salmon as Determined from Microsatellite Analysis (2006, background): “In the south, recolonization of the upper Fraser and Thompson River drainages may have occurred from source populations in the upper Columbia and Snake River drainages (Utter et al. 1989; Reisenbichler et al. 2003).”