The 12-Month Prevalence and Trends in DSM–IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence
By B. Grant, D. Dawson, F. Stinson, S. Chou, M. Dufour, R. Pickering. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2004
1,572 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background Alcohol abuse and dependence can be disabling disorders, but accurate information is lacking on the prevalence of current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition (DSM–IV) alcohol abuse and dependence and how this has changed over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to present nationally representative data on the prevalence of 12-month DSM–IV alcohol abuse and dependence in 2001–2002 and, for the first time, to examine trends in alcohol abuse and dependence between 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. Methods Prevalences and trends of alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States were derived from face-to-face interviews in the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism’s (NIAAA) 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC: n = 43,093) and NIAAA’s 1991–1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES: n = 42,862). Results Prevalences of DSM–IV alcohol abuse and dependence in 2001–2002 were 4.65 and 3.81 percent. Abuse and dependence were more common among males and among younger respondents. The prevalence of abuse was greater among Whites than among Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. The prevalence of dependence was higher in Whites, Native Americans, and Hispanics than Asians. Between 1991–1992 and 2001–2002, abuse increased while dependence declined. Increases in alcohol abuse were observed among males, females, and young Black and Hispanic minorities, while the rates of dependence rose among males, young Black females, and Asian males. Conclusions This study underscores the need to continue monitoring prevalence and trends and to design culturally sensitive prevention and intervention programs.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Neurology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9267794f2896ca80d34c1126d3365a0b85c3d317
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- GENDER AND ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION: PATTERNS FROM THE MULTINATIONAL GENACIS PROJECT (2009, background): “Past research in Europe and North America had led us to expect that alcohol use in general, and heavy drinking in particular, would be a pattern of youth that would decline as individuals grew older and developed increased social responsibilities [20,33–35].”
- Age at drinking onset and alcohol dependence: age at onset, duration, and severity. (2006, methodology): “The survey methods and other quality control procedures and test-retest reliability tests have been detailed by Grant et al.(14) The research protocol, including informed consent procedures, received full ethical review and approval from the US Census Bureau and the Office of Management and Budget.”
- Associations Between Socioeconomic Factors and Alcohol Outcomes (2016, background): “A meta-analysis of international studies determined a mean alcohol-dependence prevalence of 38 percent among homeless individuals (Fazel et al. 2008), which is 10 times the prevalence of alcohol dependence in the general U.S. population (Grant et al. 2004).”
- Relationship between household income and mental disorders: findings from a population-based longitudinal study. (2011, background): “37,40 For the sake of brevity and because multiple previous reports have been published, information on the general demographics, 41,42 preva-( lence of mental disorders, 43-45 and incidence of mental disorders 39,40,46 in the NESARC are not included in this report.”
- Sex Differences in Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders: Neurobiological Perspectives (2014, background): “For example, men are more likely to suffer from substancerelated disorders, such as alcohol and drug abuse [10; 11].”