Exact PT-symmetry is equivalent to Hermiticity
By Ali Mostafazadeh. 2003
374 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We show that a quantum system possessing an exact antilinear symmetry, in particular PT-symmetry, is equivalent to a quantum system having a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We construct the unitary operator relating an arbitrary non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with exact PT-symmetry to a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We apply our general results to PT-symmetry in finite dimensions and give the explicit form of the above-mentioned unitary operator and Hermitian Hamiltonian in two dimensions. Our findings lead to the conjecture that non-Hermitian CPT-symmetric field theories are equivalent to certain nonlocal Hermitian field theories.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb4ef35e3bd4be2a0031e1ee2f71bf74207c5006
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- K. Kawabata
- Masatoshi Sato
- Ken Shiozaki
- Masahito Ueda
- Jianke Yang
- Dmitry A. Zezyulin
- Sergey V. Dmitriev
- Chao-Kuei Lee
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- K. Kawabata
- Jianke Yang
- Dmitry A. Zezyulin
- Masatoshi Sato
- Sergey V. Dmitriev
- Chao-Kuei Lee
- Jiahao Huang
- Vladimir V. Konotop
Citations in the corpus
- Nonlinear switching and solitons in PT‐symmetric photonic systems (2015, background): “Thus, the following question naturally arises: are there any significant differences between these PT-symmetric and Hermitian systems having the same eigenvalues in nonlinear regime? To answer this question we introduce new system, described by the equation i u̇ = −[HH + F(u)]u, where HH can be cons”
- Symmetry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics (2018, background): “[221] A.”
- Nonlinear waves in PT -symmetric systems (2016, background): “Therefore, one can also consider the generalized parity operator P (Bender, Berry, and Mandilara, 2002; Mostafazadeh, 2003b, 2008), with P being an arbitrary unitary linear operator: P†P = PP† = I.”