Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality
By A. Ngwira, C. Thierfelder, Dayton M. Lambert. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2012
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Conservation agriculture (CA) systems are based upon minimal soil disturbance; crop residue retention and crop rotation and/or intercrop association are increasingly seen to recycle nutrients, increase yield and reduce production costs. This study examines the effects of CA practices on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality under the conditions encountered by smallholder farmers in two farming communities from 2005 to 2011 in Malawi, as part of the contribution to remedy a lack of supporting agronomic research for these relatively new systems. The drier agroenvironment of Lemu of Bazale Extension Planning Area (EPA) is characterized by sandy clay loam soils and lower rainfall. Here, CA showed positive benefits on maize yield after the first season of experimentation, with highest increases of 2.7 Mg ha−1 and 2.3 Mg ha−1 more yield in CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop, respectively, than the conventional tillage in the driest season of 2009/10. In the high rainfall environment of Zidyana EPA (characterized by sandy loam soils), substantial maize yield benefits resulted in the fifth season of experimentation. Farmers spent at most 50 days ha−1 (US$140) producing maize under CA systems compared with 62 days ha−1(US$176) spent under conventional tillage practices. In Lemu, both CA systems resulted in gross margins three times higher than that of the conventional control plot, while in Zidyana, CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop resulted in 33 and 23% higher gross margins, respectively, than conventional tillage. In Zidyana, the earthworm population was highest (48 earthworms m−2 in the first 30 cm) in CA monocrop maize, followed by a CA maize–legume intercropping (40 earthworms) and lowest (nine earthworms) in conventionally tilled treatment. In both study locations CA monocrop maize and CA maize–legume intercrop gave higher water infiltration than the conventional treatment. Improvements in crop productivity, overall economic gain and soil quality have made CA an attractive system for farmers in Malawi and other areas with similar conditions. However, for extensive adoption of CA by smallholder farmers, cultural beliefs that crop production is possible without the ubiquitous ridge and furrow system and residue burning for mice hunting have to be overcome.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb4ea05f2ce930d037c5640210495f7b77b6bb5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- The Dynamics of Climate Change Adaptation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Climate-Smart Agriculture among Small-Scale Farmers (2019, background): “Some farmers have moved to crop diversification, changing plant days and mixed cropping [21].”
- Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices: Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions (2018, background): “There has emerged a significant literature on the agronomic and economic impacts of CA for smallholder farmers as well as patterns of CA adoption (e.g., Haggblade and Tembo, 2003; Baudron et al., 2007; Giller et al., 2009; Kassam et al., 2009; Erenstein et al., 2012; Ngwira et al., 2012; Pannell et ”
- The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers (2014, background): “Ngwira et al. (2012a) also found higher variable costs under CA in Malawi.”