DSM‐IV personality disorders and the Five‐Factor Model of personality: a multi‐method examination of domain‐ and facet‐level predictions

By R. Bagby, Paul T. Costa, T. Widiger, Andrew G. Ryder, Margarita B. Marshall. 2005

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb4a6c21da97a7c5c165f5a6f81809f496c30af4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Samuel
2. T. Widiger
3. L. Clark
4. Robert Krueger
5. Timothy Trull
6. Christopher J. Hopwood
7. M. Back
8. D. Watson

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. (2007, methodology): “Lowerorder (facet-level) characterizations differentiate better among individuals with PD than do higher-order (domain-level) ones (Bagby et al. 2005a, Morey et al. 2002, Reynolds & Clark 2001).”
• A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. (2008, background): “However, the full matrix of correlations was obtained in some instances upon request from the first author (e.g., Bagby et al., 2005; Carlson & Furr, 2007).”