The Relationship of Yoga, Body Awareness, and Body Responsiveness to Self-Objectification and Disordered Eating

By J. Daubenmier. 2005

415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb4a0a8dec1a101311f499592bb0a22244a84da6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Tiggemann
2. Bonnie Moradi
3. A. Slater
4. E. Williams
5. J. Daubenmier
6. Yu-Ping Huang
7. A. Stewart
8. W. Mehling

In Marketing

1. A. Slater
2. M. Tiggemann
3. Bonnie Moradi
4. A. Stewart
5. W. Mehling
6. M. Acree
7. Cynthia Price
8. Yu-Ping Huang

Citations in the corpus

• Body Awareness: Construct and Self-Report Measures (2009, methodology): “A variety of therapeutic approaches in common use throughout the world claim to enhance body awareness [72] including yoga [23,73], TaiChi, massage [74–76], Body-Oriented Psychotherapy [74], mindfulness based therapies/meditation [41], Feldenkrais [77], Alexander Method [78], Breath Therapy [79], an”
• The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2) (2018, methodology): “[25] In addition to the Body Responsiveness Scale (BRS)[26] and the Scale of Body Connection (SBC),[27] the MAIA is— despite its shortcomings—currently still the most widely used self-report measure of interoceptive bodily awareness.”
• The Role of Self-Objectification in Disordered Eating, Depressed Mood, and Sexual Functioning Among Women (2011, background): “In particular, links have been demonstrated between trait self-objectification or self-surveillance with body shame (Augustus-Horvath & Tylka, 2009; McKinley, 1998; McKinley & Hyde, 1996; Moradi, Dirks, & Matteson, 2005; Muehlenkamp & SarisBaglama, 2002; Muehlenkamp, Swanson, & Brausch, 2005; Noll &”
• Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions (2008, background): “Importantly, Daubenmier (2005) assessed both awareness of and responsiveness to bodily messages and found that only responsiveness to bodily messages mediated the positive association between self-objectification and eating disorder symptoms.”
• Self-compassion, Body Image, and Self-reported Disordered Eating (2014, background): “Other approaches aim to increase body awareness (e.g., Craighead, 2006; Daubenmier, 2005; Impett, Daubenmier, & Hirschman, 2006).”
• Autonomy and control motivation and self-esteem (2007, neutral): “Given the cultural tendency to objectify women (e.g., Daubenmier, 2005; Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998), it is not difficult to imagine this happening; however, a sex difference on the SSES appearance subscale has not been documented in previous studies.”
• Feminism: What is it Good For? Feminine Norms and Objectification as the Link between Feminist Identity and Clinically Relevant Outcomes (2007, background): “Additionally, these variables have consistently been found to relate to eating pathology, such that the more an individual endorses these self-objectification variables, the more vulnerable that individual is to experiencing eating problems ( Daubenmier 2005; Moradi et al. 2005; Muehlenkamp and Sar”
• Media Exposure, Extracurricular Activities, and Appearance-Related Comments as Predictors of Female Adolescents’ Self-Objectification (2015, result): “For example, some studies with adult women have suggested that those who regularly participate in yoga exhibit lower levels of self-objectification (Daubenmier, 2005; Impett, Daubenmier, & Hirschman, 2006; Prichard & Tiggemann, 2008), whereas adult former ballet dancers (Tiggemann & Slater, 2001) an”
• Predictors and Effects of Self-Objectification in Lesbians (2008, result): “The relationship between self-objectification and negative eating attitudes has been replicated in a number of other studies (Daubenmier, 2005; Moradi et al., 2005; Muehlenkamp & Saris-Baglama, 2002; Tiggemann & Kuring, 2004; Tylka & Hill, 2004).”
• The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) (2012, methodology): “The awareness of the connection between body sensations and emotional states means strong skills in mindful observation (FFMQ-OBS), valuing the importance of listening to body sensations (BRQ-LSTN) and, as expected, a lack of difficulties in emotional awareness and clarity as measured by the DERS AW”