A critique of the female sexual perpetrator research

By Jill Johansson-Love, William J. Fremouw. 2006

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb3b5a84aef20ba185d84a94072639a44db146f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. A. Beech
2. Tony Ward
3. Dawn L. Fisher
4. A. Flores
5. I. Meyer
6. Theresa A. Gannon
7. Jan Looman
8. J. Abracen

In Gender Studies

1. A. Flores
2. I. Meyer
3. Tony Ward
4. A. Beech
5. Lara Stemple
6. Riki Savaya
7. Guy Shilo
8. D. Frost

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Beech
2. Tony Ward
3. A. Flores
4. I. Meyer
5. Lara Stemple
6. D. Frost
7. Dawn M. Szymanski
8. Theresa A. Gannon

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing female sexual offenders’ motivations and cognitions: an exploratory study (2009, background): “Johansson-Love and Fremouw (2006) also raise the issue that there is little research currently on the similarities/differences between male and female sexual offenders, but it would appear that female sex offenders groom their victims in similar ways to male sex offenders (Ford, 2006), and use…”
• Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence (2017, background): “…2006; Matthews, Matthews, & Speltz, 1989; McCarty, 1986; Rosencrans, 1997; Syed & Williams, 1996) and that women perpetrators have often experienced severe childhood sexual abuse themselves (Christopher, Lutz-Zois, & Reinhardt, 2007; Johansson-Love & Fremouw, 2006; Sandler & Freeman, 2009).”