Common but differentiated convergence (CDC): a new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010 (2013, background): “2000; Bode 2004), contraction and convergence toward a common per capita emission rate at a predetermined year (Global Commons Institute 2008), common but differentiated convergence with favorable allowances for non-Annex I countries (Höhne et al. 2006), multicriteria regimes that account for histor”
Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets (2008, background): “In Höhne et al. (2006) a variant of the per capita convergence (‘common but differentiated convergence’) is presented, in which the per capita emissions of all countries converge to a low level.”
Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5 °C-compliant global mitigation effort (2017, background): “immediately, without a transition period during which large allocations are grandfathered based on past emission levels, rather than the nominal equity principle [examples include variants of Contraction and Convergence (Meyer 2004; Höhne et al. 2006), or the recent implementations of various burden”
The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers (2015, background): “2000), some commentators have proposed the concept of equal per capita allocation over time, with convergence toward a common per capita emission rate (Höhne et al. 2006).”