A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

By H. Slabbekoorn, N. Bouton, Ilse van Opzeeland, A. Coers, C. ten Cate, A. Popper. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb0bb360473958baad16eb2cb4fc95dda2bfc56d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

A New Framework for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammals in a Rapidly Changing Arctic (2012, background): “It degrades marine-mammal acoustic habitat much like fog or smoke obscures important visual signals for terrestrial animals (Slabbekoorn et al. 2010).”
The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research (2011, background): “Given the growing interest in the effects of noise on fish communication (e.g., Ladich, 2008; Slabbekoorn et al., 2010) the lacking data will hopefully be published in the near future.”
Boat noise disrupts orientation behaviour in a coral reef fish (2013, background): “As international concern grows, an increasing number of studies are showing that anthropogenic noise impacts marine species across a range of physiological, cognitive and behavioural processes, at individual and community scales (e.g. Allen & Read 2000, Slabbekoorn et al. 2010).”
Predicting the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances on marine populations (2018, background): “Human impacts on marine ecosystems are increasing globally (Halpern et al., 2015), and fisheries bycatch and anthropogenic noise in particular pose a growing threat to many species (Lewison, Crowder, Read, & Freeman, 2004; Slabbekoorn et al., 2010; Shannon et al., 2016).”
Communication in troubled waters: responses of fish communication systems to changing environments (2011, background): “Vocalization and hearing ranges of fishes can overlap with anthropogenic sounds (Vasconcelos et al. 2007; Popper and Hastings 2009; Slabbekoorn et al. 2010) which could compromise the transmission, reception and perception of acoustic signals (Table 1).”
A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “…b; Popper and Hawkins, 2012, 2016 Use of sound by fishes and invertebrates Tavolga, 1971; Myrberg, 1981; Hawkins and Myrberg, 1983; Cotter, 2008; Slabbekoorn et al., 2010; Vermeij et al., 2010; Stanley et al., 2012; Ladich, 2013 Part 1: Underwater acoustics and sound sources www.dosits.org;…”
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife (2016, neutral): “, 2010; Kight & Swaddle, 2011), or targeted specific taxonomic groups such as birds (Patricelli & Blickley, 2006; Slabbekoorn & Ripmeester, 2008; Ortega, 2012; Slabbekoorn, 2013), fish (Slabbekoorn et al., 2010; Radford, Kerridge & Simpson, 2014), and invertebrates (Morley et al.”
Context-dependent impacts of anthropogenic noise on individual and social behaviour in a cooperatively breeding fish (2013, background): “Anthropogenic (man-made) noise penetrates through all media and can potentially affect any animal capable of hearing (Slabbekoorn et al. 2010).”
Evidence of the Lombard effect in fishes (2014, background): “tion have contributed to the rise and spread of anthropogenic noise (Slabbekoorn et al. 2010).”