Bi-relative algebraic K-theory and topological cyclic homology

By Thomas H. Geisser, L. Hesselholt. 2004

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It is well-known that algebraic K-theory preserves products of rings. However, in general, algebraic K-theory does not preserve fiber products of rings, and one defines bi-relative algebraic K-theory so as to measure the deviation. It was proved recently by Cortinas [6] that, rationally, bi-relative algebraic K-theory and bi-relative negative cyclic homology agree. In this paper, we show that, with finite coefficients, bi-relative algebraic K-theory and bi-relative topological cyclic homology agree. As an application, we show that for a possibly singular curve over a perfect field k of positive characteristic p, the cyclotomic trace map induces an isomorphism of the p-adic algebraic K-groups and the p-adic topological cyclic homology groups in non-negative degrees. As a further application, we show that the difference between the p-adic K-groups of the integral group ring of a finite group and the p-adic K-groups of a maximal Z-order in the rational group algebra can be expressed entirely in terms of topological cyclic homology. Let F be a functor that to a unital associative ring A associates a symmetric spectrum F (A). If I ⊂ A is a two-sided ideal, the relative term F (A, I) is defined to be the homotopy fiber of the map F (A) → F (A/I) induced from the canonical projection. If further f : A → B is a ring homomorphism such that f : I → f(I) is an isomorphism onto a two-sided ideal of B, there is an induced map F (A, I)→ F (B, f(I)), and the bi-relative term F (A,B, I) is defined to be the homotopy fiber of this map. Then there is a distinguished triangle in the stable homotopy category

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fad4d4310a5e2ef016cb93e88da71fc30772246e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

  1. B. Bhatt
  2. A. Mathew
  3. Dustin Clausen
  4. Christian Haesemeyer
  5. Charles A. Weibel
  6. Guillermo Cortiñas
  7. M. Morrow
  8. T. Goodwillie

In Mathematical Physics

  1. B. Bhatt
  2. A. Mathew
  3. Dustin Clausen
  4. Charles A. Weibel
  5. Christian Haesemeyer
  6. M. Morrow
  7. T. Goodwillie
  8. R. McCarthy

Citations in the corpus