Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimators
By Joseph Sexton, Petter Laake. 2009
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Stefan Wager
- Giles Hooker
- Sarah Tan
- Susan Athey
- R. Caruana
- Lucas K. Mentch
- Yin Lou
- Anne-Laure Boulesteix
In Statistics and Probability
- Stefan Wager
- Susan Athey
- Giles Hooker
- Julie Tibshirani
- Lucas K. Mentch
- Trevor J. Hastie
- Robert Tibshirani
- R. Caruana
Citations in the corpus
- Local Linear Forests (2018, methodology): “Early versions of confidence intervals for random forests, backed by heuristic arguments and empirical evidence, were proposed by Sexton and Laake (2009) and Wager, Hastie, and Efron (2014).”
- Generalized random forests (2016, methodology): “Fig 2: Comparison of quantile regression using generalized random forests and the quantregForest package of Meinshausen (2006). In both cases, we have n = 2, 000 independent and identically distributed examples where Xi is uniformly distributed over [−1, 1]p with p = 40, and Yi is Gaussian condition”
- Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillation With Side Information (2017, methodology): “We employ a bootstrap-of-little-bags approach originally developed for bagged models in [39] to obtain pointwise confidence intervals for GA2M feature contributions, and the difference of two GA2M models’ feature contributions.”
- Estimation and Accuracy after Model Selection (2013, background): “A particularly apt reference is Sexton and Laake (2009), who also provide modified bootstrap estimates of accuracy for estimators involving model selection.”
- Asymptotic Theory for Random Forests (2014, result): “Our work builds on recent contributions by Duan [14], Sexton and Laake [29] and Wager et al.”
- Quantifying Uncertainty in Random Forests via Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests (2014, background): “Sexton and Laake (2009) propose estimating the standard error of bagged trees and random forests using jackknife and bootstrap estimators.”
- Getting Better from Worse: Augmented Bagging and a Cautionary Tale of Variable Importance (2020, background): “…normality (Mentch and Hooker, 2016; Wager and Athey, 2018), and rates of convergence (Peng et al., 2019) as well as means by which standard errors (Sexton and Laake, 2009), confidence intervals (Wager et al., 2014; Mentch and Hooker, 2016), and hypothesis testing procedures (Mentch and Hooker,…”
- Ensemble Trees and CLTs: Statistical Inference for Supervised Learning (2014, unknown): “Sexton and Laake [2009] propose estimating the standard error of bagged trees and random forests us-ing jackknife and bootstrap estimators.”
- Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknife (2013, methodology): “Other approaches that rely on forming second-order bootstrap replicates have been studied by Duan (2011) and Sexton and Laake (2009).”
- Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges (2021, background): “However, more sophisticated alternatives exist to provide unbiased estimates (Sexton & Laake, 2009).”