Guiding Combinatorial Optimization with UCT
By Ashish Sabharwal, Horst Samulowitz, Chandra Reddy. 2012
82 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Economics and Econometrics
- Edward Jack Powley
- Cameron Browne
- Simon M. M. Lucas
- Simon Colton
- Yann LeCun
- Peter I. Cowling
- Spyridon Samothrakis
- Diego Perez Liebana
In Sociology and Political Science
In Reinforcement Learning
- Andrea Lodi
- Simon M. M. Lucas
- Yann LeCun
- Le Song
- Bistra N. Dilkina
- Spyridon Samothrakis
- Yuyu Zhang
- Diego Perez Liebana
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphs (2017, methodology): “This thread includes machine learning methods for branching [26, 22], tree node selection [16, 34], and heuristic selection [35, 23].”
- On learning and branching: a survey (2017, background): “In Sabharwal et al. (2012), the exploited framework is that of reinforcement learning (see Sect.”
- A Survey of Monte Carlo Tree Search Methods (2012, methodology): “Mixed Integer Programming In the study performed by Sabharwal and Samulowitz [179], UCT is applied to guide Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), comparing the performance of the UCT based node selection with that of CPLEX, a traditional MIP solver, and best-first, breadth-first and depth-first strategie”
- Model-Based Planning with Discrete and Continuous Actions (2017, methodology): “This method can be shown to achieve optimal performance given a perfect environment model and enough simulated rollouts, and has been successfully used in contexts such as games (Silver et al., 2016), combinatorial optimization (Sabharwal et al., 2012) and scheduling (Cazenave et al., 2009).”