Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach (2012, background): “Hence, whether the benefits of collaboration are realized, depends on the complementarity of the partners’ resources, aims and working routines (Cantner and Meder, 2007).”
Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Discrete Choice Model (2011, background): “This view is supported by Cantner and Meder ( 2007 ), who confirm with patent data that technological proximity has a positive influence on collaboration activities.”
What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location (2011, background): “Cantner and Meder (2007) find that cognitive proximity is relevant for cooperation activities.”
Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox (2012, background): “Cantner and Meder (2007) find that cognitive and social proximity are relevant for cooperation activities.”
The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography (2010, unknown): “(Grabher and Stark, 1997; Boschma, 2005; Cantner and Meder, 2007; Nooteboom et al., 2007; Broekel and Meder, 2008).”