Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons.

By James R. Cavanaugh, Wyeth Bair, J. Anthony Movshon. 2002

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The Operating Point of the Cortex: Neurons as Large Deviation Detectors (2007, background): “As the stimulus is increased, it is expected that gain would decrease (Cavanaugh et al., 2002a,b), implying an increase in normalized threshold that could induce a corresponding decrease in firing rate while increasing response selectivity and sparseness.”
Predictive Coding as a Model of Response Properties in Cortical Area V1 (2010, background): “Such effects have been recorded in V1 (Crook et al., 1998) and analogous data has been obtained from cortical area TE (Wang et al.”
Attentional modulation of visual processing. (2004, background): “Evidence exists that such surround effects rely on divisive inhibition from the receptive field surround tuned for the neuron’s preferred orientation (Cavanaugh et al. 2002a,b; Muller et al. 2003; Webb et al. 2003).”
Feed-Forward Segmentation of Figure-Ground and Assignment of Border-Ownership (2010, background): “Finally, inhibition from the surround has been shown to be orientation or direction selective [34–38].”
Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision (2005, background): “One is “surround suppression,” in which the mask has the orientation preferred by the neuron but is presented outside the receptive field (DeAngelis et al., 1994; Cavanaugh et al., 2002).”
The Normalization Model of Attention (2009, background): “Other possible mechanisms include an increase in the overall synaptic conductance at high contrasts (Chance et al., 2002) or a decrease in noise at high contrasts whichmakes the cells less responsive because their membrane potential is less likely to cross threshold (Finn et al.”
Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Concentration is Reduced in Visual Cortex in Schizophrenia and Correlates with Orientation-Specific Surround Suppression (2010, unknown): “However, the spatial (Angelucci et al., 2002; Cavanaugh et al., 2002a) and temporal (Bair et al., 2003) properties of surround suppression suggest a critical role for feedback projections from extrastriate cortex (Angelucci and Bressloff, 2006).”
A mechanistic cortical microcircuit of attention for amplification, normalization and suppression. (2015, methodology): “Surround suppression is widely observed in the visual cortex: in LGN (Bonin et al., 2005); V1 (Bair et al., 2003; Cavanaugh et al., 2002a, Cavanaugh, Bair, & Movshon, 2002b); V2 (Ito & Gilbert, 1999; Willmore, Prenger, & Gallant, 2010); V4 (Sundberg, Mitchell, & Reynolds, 2009); MT (Allman, Miezin,…”
Synaptic and network mechanisms of sparse and reliable visual cortical activity during nonclassical receptive field stimulation. (2010, background): “…literature indicating an overall suppression of CRF elicited responses with nCRF costimulation (Angelucci and Bressloff, 2006; Bair et al., 2003; Cavanaugh et al., 2002b; DeAngelis et al., 1994; Durand et al., 2007; Fitzpatrick, 2000; Jones et al., 2001; Webb et al., 2005), and increased…”