The ATLAS3D Project – XXVIII. Dynamically driven star formation suppression in early-type galaxies

By T. Davis, L. M. Young, A. Crocker, M. Bureau, L. Blitz, K. Alatalo, Eric Emsellem, T. Naab, E. Bayet, M. Bois and 15 more. 2014

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present measurements of the star formation rate (SFR) in the early-type galaxies (ETGs) of the ATLAS 3D sample, based on Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) 22 µm and Galaxy Evolution Explorerfar-ultraviolet emission. We combine these with gas masses estimated from 12 CO and H I data in order to investigate the star formation efficiency (S FE) in a larger sample of ETGs than previously available. We first rec alibrate (based on WISE data) the relation between old stellar populations (traced at Ks-band) and 22 µm luminosity, allowing us to remove the contribution of 22 µm emission from circumstellar dust. We then go on to investigate the position of ETGs on the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relation. Molecular gas-rich ETGs have comparable star formation surface densities to normal spiral galaxy centres, but they lie systematically offset from the KS relation, having lower star formation efficiencies by a factor of �2.5 (in agreement with other authors). This effect is driven by galaxies where a substantial fraction of the molecular material is in the ris ing part of the rotation curve, and shear is high. We show here for the first time that although the number of stars formed per unit gas mass per unit time is lower in ETGs, it seems that the amount of stars formed per freefall time is approximately constant. The scatter around thi s dynamical relation still correlates with galaxy properties such as the shape of the potential in t he inner regions. This leads us to suggest that dynamical properties (such as shear or the global stability of the gas) may be important second parameters that regulate star formation and cause much of the scatter around star-formation relations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa8bebbfa5be0c1b738a51cd28d444ff3a80d3fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Cappellari
  2. T. Naab
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. R. Somerville
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. S. Khochfar
  8. Volker Springel

In Instrumentation

  1. M. Cappellari
  2. T. Naab
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. S. Khochfar
  6. Joop Schaye
  7. M. Sarzi
  8. M. Bureau

Citations in the corpus