Identifying refugia from climate change

By Michael B. Ashcroft. 2010

502 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa884b652be91900e95afd748d68857f64beb42a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Thiago Fernando Rangel
2. Jonathan Lenoir
3. Miguel B. Araújo
4. Jonas J. Lembrechts
5. I. Nijs
6. I. Maclean
7. Michael B. Ashcroft
8. G. Oliveira

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Jonas J. Lembrechts
2. Jonathan Lenoir
3. I. Nijs
4. Thiago Fernando Rangel
5. G. Zardi
6. G. Oliveira
7. Miguel B. Araújo
8. K. Nicastro

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Thiago Fernando Rangel
2. Jonathan Lenoir
3. Miguel B. Araújo
4. Jonas J. Lembrechts
5. I. Nijs
6. Michael B. Ashcroft
7. I. Maclean
8. G. Oliveira

Citations in the corpus

• Climate‐change refugia in boreal North America: what, where, and for how long? (2020, unknown): “Ashcroft MB. 2010.”
• Climate refugia of snow leopards in High Asia (2016, background): “Refugia usually have a relatively stable climate and complex landscape topography, and thus offer the best chance for survival of many taxa when climate changes (Ashcroft, 2010; Morelli et al., 2016).”
• Connectivity for species on the move: supporting climate‐driven range shifts (2019, unknown): “Ashcroft MB. 2010.”
• Upwelling areas as climate change refugia for the distribution and genetic diversity of a marine macroalga (2016, background): “As a result, the importance of refugia is increasingly recognized (Ashcroft, 2010; Keppel et al., 2012; Gavin et al., 2014).”
• Linking small-scale topography with microclimate, plant species diversity and intra-specific trait variation in an alpine landscape (2015, background): “Topographically complex 61 terrain should therefore contain a wide range of plant niches, and might be likely locations of 62 climatic micro-refugia (Ashcroft 2010; Dobrowski 2011).”
• Incorporating microclimate into species distribution models (2018, background): “…of time amidst deteriorating climatic 82 conditions; and microrefugia, where these isolated populations can persist for a longer time until 83 climatic conditions return to baseline or suitable (Ashcroft 2010, Dobrowski 2011, Hannah et al. 2014, 84 Lenoir et al. 2017, Meineri and Hylander 2017).”
• Areas of Climate Stability of Species Ranges in the Brazilian Cerrado: Disentangling Uncertainties Through Time (2012, background): “2010; Ashcroft 2010), implying that historically stable areas (refugia), which are potentially important for biodiversity conservation at present may be unlikely to remain suitable in the future.”
• Climate‐induced resource bottlenecks exacerbate species vulnerability: a review (2015, background): “relatively stable climatically on shorter time-scales and smaller spatial scales (Ashcroft, 2010; Mackey et al., 2012; Olson et al., 2012).”
• Vulnerability of global biodiversity hotspots to climate change (2021, background): “…need for species to relocate or disperse in response to climate cycles (Bátori et al., 2017; Carnaval et al., 2009; Dobrowski, 2011; Park, 2019) and might therefore provide disproportionate benefit to those populations most at risk from future climate changes (Ashcroft, 2010; Hannah et al., 2014).”
• Fine‐resolution (25 m) topoclimatic grids of near‐surface (5 cm) extreme temperatures and humidities across various habitats in a large (200 × 300 km) and diverse region (2011, background): “However, these risks may currently be overestimated, as predictions are typically based on coarse-scale climate grids that ignore microrefugia where species can persist despite unfavourable regional conditions (Pearson, 2006; Ashcroft, 2010; Austin and Van Niel 2011).”