Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Psycholinguistic Theory of Loanword Adaptations (2004, background): “Given the overall similarity between speech perception data and loanword adaptations, Peperkamp & Dupoux (2003) propose that all loanword adaptations are phonetically minimal transformations that apply in perception.3 In”
The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations (2006, background): “Many researches have argued that phonetic proximity plays a role in loanword adaptations, be it restricted to special cases (Silverman, 1992; Yip, 1993; Takagi and Mann, 1994; Rose, 1999; Gbeto, 2000; Kenstowicz, 2001; Kim and Curtis, 2002; Kang, 2003), or extended to all loanword adaptations ( Pepe”
Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai (2006, background): “Peperkamp and Dupoux (2003) propose that loanword adaptation takes place in an extra-grammatical speech perception module that maps the surface form of the loan into an acoustic signal that is then decoded and matched with an output from the native grammar.”