Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading

By Matthew J. Traxler, Martin J. Pickering, Brian McElree. 2002

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa7b6597d59613b118001464fa862ddffdc373c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Giosuè Baggio
2. Martin J. Pickering
3. Brian McElree
4. Matthew J. Traxler
5. Steven Frisson
6. Lillian Chen
7. Keith Rayner
8. Adrian Staub

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Giosuè Baggio
2. Brian McElree
3. Martin J. Pickering
4. Matthew J. Traxler
5. Steven Frisson
6. Keith Rayner
7. Robert J. Hartsuiker
8. Adrian Staub

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Giosuè Baggio
2. Martin J. Pickering
3. Steven Frisson
4. Brian McElree
5. Lillian Chen
6. Matthew J. Traxler
7. Anita R. Bowles
8. Walter Kintsch

Citations in the corpus

• Semantics and the electrophysiology of meaning: Tense, aspect, event structure (2004, methodology): “A series of studies have shown that coercing sentences result in increased processing costs compared to controls [137, 205, 204, 136, 173], and some ERP evidence for complement coercion will be presented in chapter 6.”
• Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion (2006, methodology): “…shown reliable effects in self-paced reading and eye-tracking tasks (McElree, Frisson, et al., 2006; McElree et al., 2001; Pickering et al., 2005; Traxler et al., 2002, 2005), as well as with other methods and measures (McElree, Pylkkänen, et al., 2006; Pylkkänen, Llinas, & McElree, 2004).”