Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths

By C. Marris. 2001

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa71106ed71143fe76a400f007d57c9e81e9f0b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Dietram A. Scheufele
2. Matthew C. Nisbet
3. P. Jauhar

In Plant Science

1. Dietram A. Scheufele
2. Matthew C. Nisbet
3. P. Jauhar

Citations in the corpus

• Modern Biotechnology as an Integral Supplement to Conventional Plant Breeding: The Prospects and Challenges (2006, background): “Attempts have been made to create fear about the potential adverse impact of GM foods or plants on human health and the environment (Borlaug, 2000; Marris, 2001; Falk et al., 2002; Jauhar and Khush, 2002) to the extent that GM experimental materials are being destroyed (Pilcher, 2003b).”
• What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. (2009, background): “Later with several colleagues, Wynne further developed this framework in studies of the controversy over genetically modifi ed crops ( Marris, 2001; Marris et al., 2001).”