Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet

By Triveni Kuchi. 2006

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa5eb06212c7dba599910fcd5ffed6f6463a7784

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion (2006, unknown): “Discourse analysis is described in detail in Dijk (1997) and Schiffrin, Tannen, and Hamilton (2001); content analysis in Krippindorff (2004), Patton (2002), and Weber (1990); and CMC in Herring (2002), Knapp and Daly (2002), and Thurlow, Tomic, and Lengel (2004) .”
Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility (2018, background): “The assumption of anonymity results in disinhibition, i.e. the “apparent reduction in concern for self-presentation and the judgement of others” (Johnson 1998: 44 cited in Thurlow et al. 2009: 62).”
From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media (2006, background): “…the deterministic view of an unstoppable ‘‘technological imperative’’ that characterizes many popular representations of computer-mediated communication (Thurlow et al., 2004, p. 41), CMD was depicted throughout the corpus as a craze (x5), a mania, a fever, a huge phenomenon, a cultural…”
Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions (2010, background): “…on almost any topic, but that information can be dangerously wrong, and CMC can encourage us to feel a stronger sense of commonality with others than we might experience FtF, potentially leading users to believe that they have more in common than they actually do (Thurlow et al. 2004: 54).”