Complexity of Teaching by a Restricted Number of Examples
By Hayato Kobayashi, Ayumi Shinohara. 2009
17 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Xiaojin Zhu
- Ji Liu
- Xuezhou Zhang
- Robert D. Nowak
- Philippe Rigollet
- H. Ohannessian
- Faisal Khan
- Bilge Mutlu
Citations in the corpus
- Machine Teaching for Bayesian Learners in the Exponential Family (2013, background): “Our framework allows for probabilistic, noisy learners with infinite hypothesis space, arbitrary loss functions, and the notion of teaching effort.”
- Teacher Improves Learning by Selecting a Training Subset (2018, background): “The theoretical study of machine teaching has focused on the teaching dimension, i.e. the minimum training set size needed to exactly teach a target concept θ ∗ [20, 38, 46, 18, 29, 45, 16, 44, 48, 9, 3, 4, 21, 31, 8, 7, 25, 5, 36, 23, 10].”
- How Do Humans Teach: On Curriculum Learning and Teaching Dimension (2011, methodology): “The first thread, developed by the computational learning theory community, is exemplified by the “teaching dimension” model [9] and its extensions [12, 10, 1, 2, 11, 13, 18].”
- The Teaching Dimension of Linear Learners (2015, background): “ Work Teaching dimension as a learning-theoretic quantity has attracted a long history of research. It was proposed independently in [13, 23]. Subsequent theoretical developments can be found in e.g. [26, 7, 2, 3, 14, 18, 6, 5, 17, 4, 22, 9, 12]. Most of them assume little extra knowledge on the lea”