Agronomic Traits Affecting Resistance to White Mold in Common Bean

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A discussion on disease severity index values. Part I: warning on inherent errors and suggestions to maximise accuracy (2017, methodology): “…1950; Hunter & Roberts, 1978; Hunter, 1983; Kobriger & Hagedorn, 1983; Chaube & Singh, 1991; Stovold & Smith, 1991; Salamati & Tronsmo, 1997; Kolkman & Kelly, 2002; Koitabashi, 2005; Kora et al., 2005; Lazarovits et al., 2007; Nitzan et al., 2008; Ghose et al., 2010; Vieira et al., 2010,…”
Breeding Common Bean for Resistance to White Mold: A Review (2013, background): “False positives for physiological resistance may result due to reduced disease severity in open plant canopies of upright determinate (Type I) and indeterminate (Type II) cultivars, especially when planted in wide-row and/ or increased within-row plant spacing (Ando et al., 2007; Kolkman and Kelly, ”
Characterization of white mold disease avoidance in common bean (2013, background): “Beans with Type II indeterminate short-vine growth habit also exhibit upright architecture but with less compact branching and a narrower overall plant profile (Kolkman and Kelly 2002).”
QTL Conferring Resistance and Avoidance to White Mold in Common Bean (2003, methodology): “The seeds) were adjusted to 18% moisture content by weight objectives of this research were to (i) discover QTL ( Kolkman and Kelly, 2002 ).”