Measuring the neutron star equation of state with gravitational wave observations

By J. Read, Charalampos Markakis, M. Shibata, K. Uryū, Jolien D. E. Creighton, J. Friedman. 2009

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We report the results of a first study that uses numerical simulations to estimate the accuracy with which one can use gravitational wave observations of double neutron-star inspiral to measure parameters of the neutron-star equation of state. The simulations use the evolution and initial-data codes of Shibata and Uryu to compute the last several orbits and the merger of neutron stars, with matter described by a parametrized equation of state. Previous work suggested the use of an effective cutoff frequency to place constraints on the equation of state. We find, however, that greater accuracy is obtained by measuring departures from the point-particle limit of the gravitational waveform produced during the late inspiral. As the stars approach their final plunge and merger, the gravitational wave phase accumulates more rapidly for smaller values of the neutron-star compactness (the ratio of the mass of the neutron-star to its radius). We estimate that realistic equations of state will lead to gravitational waveforms that are distinguishable from point-particle inspirals at an effective distance (the distance to an optimally oriented and located system that would produce an equivalent waveform amplitude) of 100 Mpc or less. As Lattimer and Prakash observed, neutron-star radius is closely tied tomore » the pressure at density not far above nuclear. Our results suggest that broadband gravitational wave observations at frequencies between 500 and 1000 Hz will constrain this pressure, and we estimate the accuracy with which it can be measured. Related first estimates of radius measurability show that the radius can be determined to an accuracy of {delta}R{approx}1 km at 100 Mpc.« less

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa3a8e4a612b1f07ae2799f44650d8fa62381bfb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. Luca Baiotti
  3. D. Holz
  4. Ilya Mandel
  5. Michela Mapelli
  6. Maya Fishbach
  7. David Radice
  8. Bernard F. Schutz

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Luca Baiotti
  2. Rana X. Adhikari
  3. Maya Fishbach
  4. The Ligo Scientific Collaboration
  5. K. Chatziioannou
  6. T. Bulik
  7. Bernard F. Schutz
  8. Josh Willis

Citations in the corpus