Effective keyword search in relational databases
By Fang Liu, Clement T. Yu, Weiyi Meng, Abdur Chowdhury. SIGMOD Conference, 2006
429 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa3768594b7e992473b98041db8396f3bce9b92f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Keyword Search in Relational Databases: A Survey (2010, methodology): “Ranking issues for MTJNTs are discussed in many papers [14, 22, 23].”
- BLINKS: ranked keyword searches on graphs (2007, background): “Keyword search on relational databases [1, 3, 17, 16, 23] has attracted much interest.”
- Identifying meaningful return information for XML keyword search (2007, background): “There is a lot of work supporting keyword search on a relational database, which is modeled as a graph of objects with connecting edges, DBXplorer [2], BANKS [5], DISCOVER [14], [18].”
- Spark: top-k keyword query in relational databases (2007, methodology): “The basic idea of the ranking method used in DISCOVER2 [15] (and its variant [22]) is to 1. assign each tuple in the JTT a score using a standard IR-ranking formula (or its variants); and 2. combine the individual scores together using a score aggregation function, comb ( · ), to obtain the final…”
- Top-k Exploration of Query Candidates for Efficient Keyword Search on Graph-Shaped (RDF) Data (2009, background): “Much work has been carried out on keyword search over tree-structured data (e.g. [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]) as well as graph-structured data (e.g. [2], [14], [1]).”