Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Nist Measurement Results

3,673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

NIST-F1: recent improvements and accuracy evaluations (2005, methodology): “However, Type A and Type B refer to the methods used to measure the physical quantity [10].”
Noodles: A Tool for Visualization of Numerical Weather Model Ensemble Uncertainty (2010, background): “The National Institute for Science and Technology (NIST) [45] proposed a combined measure that takes the propagation effects of uncertainty into consideration.”
Torsion–rotation global analysis of the first three torsional states (νt = 0, 1, 2) and terahertz database for methanol (2008, background): “d Parameter uncertainties are given in parentheses, and represent one standard deviation in the last digit (type A, k = 1, [28]).”
An experimental investigation of convection heat transfer to supercritical carbon dioxide in miniature tubes (2002, methodology): “The uncertainties in the experimental data were evaluated according to the methods introduced in NIST Technical Note 1297 [14].”
Ruby under pressure (2008, background): “Estimates of error margins of a calibration need to take into account the uncertainties treated by statistical methods and possible systematic errors [258].”