SEARCH COSTS AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DISPERSERS

By J. Stamps, V. V. Krishnan, M. Reid. 2005

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa01f6cfc3af6eee79754563f9c49f2c5dc44da0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Desperate larvae: influence of deferred costs and habitat requirements on habitat selection (2007, methodology): “In contrast, Stamps et al. (2005) assumed that each time unit spent searching incurs 1 unit of deferred cost.”
A metapopulation perspective for salmon and other anadromous fish (2007, background): “loss of time for reproduction in the destination patch (Stamps et al. 2005; Van Dyck and Baguette 2005).”
Causes of decoupling between larval supply and settlement and consequences for understanding recruitment and population connectivity (2010, background): “Complex processes, including larval transport (Kingsford et al., 2002) and optimal behavioral variability (Raimondi and Keough, 1990; Stamps et al., 2005; Toonen and Tyre, 2007), may, instead, determine patterns of settlement at these larger scales.”
What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? (2010, background): “Also, dispersers often experience increased mortality and negative interactions with other species (Johnson & Gaines 1990; Morris 1992; Stamps et al. 2005) and can be important vectors in the spread of disease (Mundt et al.”
Radio tagging reveals the roles of corpulence, experience and social information in ant decision making (2009, background): “However, exploration of a novel area can be more costly than foraging in a familiar one (Isbell et al. 1993; Stamps et al. 2005; Eliassen et al. 2007), so individuals might have different thresholds for performing these different external tasks.”
Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers (2006, background): “…outlined in this paper stem from an extensive body of theory on situations in which animals search for an item with important effects on fitness, such as a mate (e.g. Real 1990; Luttbeg 2002, 2004; Hutchinson & Halupka 2004), or a habitat (e.g. Ward 1987; Baker & Rao 2004; Stamps et al. 2005).”
MEASURING HABITAT QUALITY: A REVIEW (2007, background): “…to animals selecting poor and avoiding rich habitats (Rapport 1991, Railsback et al. 2003), including incomplete information (Shochat et al. 2002, Stamps et al. 2005), ecological traps (Battin 2004), time lags and site fidelity (Davis and Stamps 2004), strong despotic distributions (Parker and…”
Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal (2007, unknown): “mortality and deferred costs (e.g., Zollner and Lima 1999; Stamps et al. 2005).”
Research Needs and Recommendations for the use of Conspecific-Attraction Methods in the Conservation of Migratory Songbirds (2010, background): “…individuals select the best habitats for settlement (Fretwell and Lucas 1969, McPeek et al. 2001), in reality individuals may make non-ideal choices and occupy poorer habitats before better ones (Misenhelter and Rotenberry 2000, Stamps and Krishnan 2005, Stamps et al. 2005, Arlt and Pärt 2008).”
Host‐plant use in the range expansion of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (2006, background): “Time limitation may then effectively make their oviposition behaviour less conservative by increasing acceptance of normally less preferred hosts ( Jaenike, 1978; Courtney, 1982; Mayhew, 1997; Rosenheim, 1999; DíazFleischer & Aluja, 2003 ; but see Stamp et al ., 2005 ).”