Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning

By Mike Oaksford. 2002

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9fc3a77c7ab410264d24ef363df23a22bb65a57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Philip N. Johnson-Laird
2. Seth Chin-Parker
3. Geoffrey P. Goodwin
4. Julie A Cantelon
5. Klaus Oberauer

In General Decision Sciences

1. Philip N. Johnson-Laird
2. Seth Chin-Parker
3. Geoffrey P. Goodwin
4. Julie A Cantelon

Citations in the corpus

• Reasoning about relations. (2005, background): “…to represent the contrast class of affirmative relations given the truth of the negation , that is, the bomb striking the ground before the siren sounded, and the bomb striking the ground after the siren sounded (Oaksford , 2002; Oaksford & Chater, 1994; Schroyens, Schaeken, & d'Ydewalle, 2001).”
• Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation-Based Category Learning (2017, background): “, Northcott, 2008; Schaffer, 2005; Sinnott-Armstrong, 2008) and across a variety of cognitive activities, such as hypothesis testing (Gale & Ball, 2012), the assessment of similarity (Goldstone, Medin, & Halberstadt, 1997), causal reasoning (Hilton, 1990), and conditional reasoning (Oaksford, 2002).”