Review of Methods to Reduce Livestock Depredation II. Aversive conditioning, deterrents and repellents
By Martin E. Smith, J. Linnell, J. Odden, Jon E. Swenson. 2000
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9cd25492ef61b5474b98927d56d889e2d757101
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- J. Shivik
- J. Linnell
- J. Odden
- R. Andersen
- A. Treves
- I. Herfindal
- Daniel T. Blumstein
- Patrick A. Darrow
Citations in the corpus
- Tools for the Edge: What's New for Conserving Carnivores (2006, methodology): “Classical and common techniques of wildlife damage management are described elsewhere (Hyngstrom et al. 1994, Conover 2002), as are surveys of common nonlethal methods (Linnell et al. 1996, Smith et al. 2000, Shivik 2004).”
- Nonlethal Techniques for Managing Predation: Primary and Secondary Repellents (2003, background): “Little other research has been conducted to test the effect of frightening devices on reducing livestock depredations by wolves (Smith et al. 2000), probably because investigations usually concluded that light and sound stimuli are limited in usefulness because of habituation (Bombford & O’Brien…”
- Lynx depredation on domestic sheep in Norway (2002, background): “Conflict with domestic sheep husbandry can be mitigated through changes in husbandry and/or separating carnivores and livestock (zoning; Linnell et al. 1996, 1997; Smith et al. 2000a,b).”