Bargaining power, effective demand and technical progress: a Kaleckian model of growth
By M. Cassetti. 2003
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9c6a081b300a3d9fc102ebb42484edda5c6745e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Eckhard Hein
- Özlem Onaran
- Artur Tarassow
- Till van Treeck
- Lucas Grafl
- G. Galanis
- Christian Schoder
In Sociology and Political Science
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Eckhard Hein
- Artur Tarassow
- Özlem Onaran
- Christian Schoder
- Lucio Baccaro
- M. Lavoie
- Till van Treeck
Citations in the corpus
- Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a post-Kaleckian model (2010, methodology): “Cassetti (2003) and Naastepad (2006), as well as already Taylor (1991: 225-228), have introduced a wage push variable into the productivity equations of their models, making use of an idea proposed by Marx (1867) and Hicks (1932).”
- Is the Nairu Theory a Monetarist, New Keynesian, Post Keynesian or a Marxist Theory? (2008, background): “10 Lavoie (2002) and Cassetti (2003) propose Kaleckian growth models with conflict inflation, where a higher price level has no effects on demand.”
- Testing the Bhaduri–Marglin model with OECD panel data (2014, unknown): “Referring to Cassetti (2003); Hein and Tarassow (2010) criticise this equation arguing that the wage share rather than the real wage should be used as cost push variable.”