Rethinking the value of high wood density
By M. Larjavaara, H. Muller‐Landau. 2010
212 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9bab0d306c3413e5f8effcd46b3ac34202acc2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Mechanical Engineering
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Radial Variation in Wood Structure and Function in Woody Plants, and Hypotheses for Its Occurrence (2011, result): “This latter argument is also supported by Larjavaara and Muller-Landau (2010) who argue that a large stem of low-density wood can have greater strength at lower construction cost than a thinner stem of high-density wood.”
- How much variation in tree mortality is predicted by soil and topography in Central Amazonia (2011, background): “However, the disadvantages of light wood species to resist against stem breakage are under question since a fat trunk of low-density wood can achieve greater strength at lower construction cost than a thin trunk of high-density wood (Larjavaara and Muller-Landau, 2010).”
- On the link between functional traits and growth rate: meta‐analysis shows effects change with plant size, as predicted (2016, background): “It has been widely expected that species with low tissue construction cost will typically have fast growth rates, at least in favourable physical environments (e.g. Muller-Landau 2004; Poorter et al. 2008; Chave et al. 2009; Larjavaara & Muller-Landau 2010; Iida et al. 2012; Paine et al. 2015).”
- Linking functional traits and demographic rates in a subtropical tree community: the importance of size dependency (2014, background): “…species with high-density wood, probably because of a reduced mechanical or physiological stability at the tissue level (e.g. xylem) and a high maintenance (respiration) cost at the organ (e.g. stem) level (Muller-Landau 2004; Chave et al. 2009; Larjavaara & Muller-Landau 2010; Iida et al. 2012).”