Living without free will

By Derk Pereboom. 2001

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9a1417aef1e33762b3f4b7d0698980bdde9ea15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Alfred R. Mele
2. Shaun Nichols
3. Max Deutsch
4. K. Stanovich
5. Leland F. Saunders
6. T. Stillman

Citations in the corpus

• Folk Intuitions on Free Will (2006, background): “Incompatibilists maintain that their view is the natural, intuitive view (Kane 1999, Pereboom 2001, Strawson 1986).”
• Experimental Philosophy on Free Will: An Error Theory for Incompatibilist Intuitions (2010, unknown): “…18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 9780230230606_11_cha09.indd 190 8/13/2010 11:03:58 AM response to the problem of moral responsibility” (Pereboom, 2001, xvi), we believe that ordinary persons typically need help seeing the allure of incompatibilism.”
• FREE WILL AND LUCK (2007, background): “Derk Pereboom claims that event-causal libertarianism ‘does not provide agents with any more control than compatibilism does’ ( 2001 , 56), and Randolph Clarke asserts that ‘the active control that is exercised on’ an event-causal libertarian view ‘is just the same as that exercised on an event-caus”