Integrating Costs of Conservation into InternationalPriority Setting

By A. Balmford, Kevin J. Gaston, A. Rodrigues, Alexander N. James. Conservation Biology, 2000

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f999880d17aad9e32b536caad4efca17cf3bff79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Michael Drielsma
2. Simon Ferrier
3. Hugh P. Possingham
4. K. Wilson
5. Stephen Polasky
6. Denis White
7. Jane Elith
8. Antoine Guisan

In Ecology

1. Michael Drielsma
2. Hugh P. Possingham
3. K. Wilson
4. Simon Ferrier
5. Stephen Polasky
6. Kathleen Segerson
7. Paul J. Ferraro
8. Denis White

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Frank Figge
2. Tobias Hahn
3. Kathleen Segerson
4. E. Nelson
5. Stephen Polasky
6. Paul J. Ferraro
7. Sven Wunder
8. Timo Kuosmanen

Citations in the corpus

• Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns (2008, background): “…reserve site selection approach by incorporating land acquisition costs and management costs into conservation planning (e.g., Ando et al., 1998; Balmford et al., 2000; Polasky et al., 2001; Moore et al., 2004; Nicholson et al., 2006; Naidoo and Iwamura, 2007; Nelson, 2007; see Naidoo et al.,…”
• Setting Conservation Priorities (2009, background): “The number of papers presenting economically grounded conservation priority setting approaches has grown (Ando et al. 1998; Balmford et al. 2000; Polasky et al. 2001; Stewart et al. 2003; Moore et al. 2004; Stewart and Possingham 2005; Wilson et al. 2006; Wilson et al. 2007; Bode et al. 2008;…”
• Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “…eutrophication (Batabyal et al. 2003, Carpenter et al. 1999, Hart 2003, Iwasa et al. 2007), habitat protection and restoration (Ando et al. 1998; Balmford et al. 2000; Montgomery et al. 1994, 1999; Naidoo et al. 2006; Nalle et al. 2004; Polasky et al. 2005, 2008; Wu et al. 2003), biodiversity…”
• Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework (2010, background): “Cost is either equated simply with the area of land protected or is estimated more rigorously in terms of acquisition, management and/or opportunity costs (e.g. Faith et al., 1996; Balmford et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2007).”
• The role of taxonomy in species conservation. (2004, unknown): “B (2004) appropriately (Balmford et al. 2000).”
• Integrating Economics into Priority Setting and Evaluation in Conservation Management (2003, methodology): “Balmford et al. (2000) concluded, however, that the approach had limitations because the results were a heuristic exploration of how and why to integrate economic concerns into priority setting, rather than an attempt to generate the definitive recipe for cost-effective conservation-management…”
• The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies (2005, background): “Integrating opportunity costs of protected areas into valuation and priority setting in biodiversity conservation are subjects of ongoing debate (Balmford et al. 2000; Lovett 2001).”
• Assigning priority to environmental policy interventions in a heterogeneous world (2003, background): “6 In a different paper, Balmford et al. (2000) argue that conservationists must integrate biological and economic data to generate cost-efficient investment strategies; i.e., the E-max approach should be used.”