Security considerations for IEEE 802.15.4 networks

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks (2008, background): “4 is insufficient for use in production networks: (i) the ack frame contains no addressing information, which can lead to false positives in acked transmissions; (ii) ack frames cannot be secured, allowing an attacker to easily inject acks [41]; and (iii) ack frames cannot carry a payload, which is ”
Anatomy of Threats to the Internet of Things (2019, background): “edgement frames) [30], [81], exploitation of Carrier Sense”
Two-factor user authentication in wireless sensor networks (2009, methodology): “Security Requirements in WSN: Sastry and Wagner [3] observed the merits and limitations of security aspects of the IEEE 802.”
A Secured Authentication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Using Elliptic Curves Cryptography (2011, background): “Sastry and Wagner [9] noted several problems with regard to the security of user authentication provided by IEEE 802.15.4 [17].”
TinySec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks (2004, unknown): “feasibility of supporting different keying models [34].”