Predicting forest stand variables from LiDAR data in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence forest of Ontario
By Murray E. Woods, Kevin Lim, P. Treitz. 2008
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9684f69a19dcc231970cc82404eb00105a09906
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Joanne C. White
- Nicholas C. Coops
- M. Wulder
- Mikko Vastaranta
- L. Ruiz
- Murray E. Woods
- Francisco Mauro
- Txomin Hermosilla
In Insect Science
- L. Ruiz
- Murray E. Woods
- M. Wulder
- Francisco Mauro
- Txomin Hermosilla
- Nicholas C. Coops
- Miguel Godino
- Mikko Vastaranta
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- L. Ruiz
- Murray E. Woods
- M. Wulder
- Francisco Mauro
- Txomin Hermosilla
- Nicholas C. Coops
- Miguel Godino
- Mikko Vastaranta
Citations in the corpus
- Analysis of the Influence of Plot Size and LiDAR Density on Forest Structure Attribute Estimates (2014, methodology): “As Figure 1 shows, there is some discrepancy when defining field sampling plot size when working with LiDAR data [5,9–31].”
- A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach (2013, result): “Studies in Ontario found that ALS metrics produced with no minimum height threshold resulted in better estimates than those that used a 2-m threshold (Woods et al. 2008; 2011); however, it should be noted that no alternative thresholds were tested in this study.”