Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement
By S. Jain. Euphytica, 2001
465 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95eab5198de9fca05e93e78cec7c6370e56671f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
- S. Fondevilla
- M. Gaj
- Diego Rubiales
- Karam B. Singh
- Nicolas Rispail
- J. van Staden
- Laurent Gentzbittel
- M. Castillejo
Citations in the corpus
- Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection—An overview of the recent progress (2011, background): “In vitro selected variants should be finally field-tested to confirm the genetic stability of the selected trait (Jain, 2001).”
- Identification of a novel elite genotype for in vitro culture and genetic transformation of cotton (2006, unknown): “The occurrence of loss of regenerability seems to be influenced by the plant genotype, explants type, the number of subcultures, and culture medium (Jain 2001).”
- Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods (2011, background): “…deal with specific aspect(s) of somaclonal variation (Lee and Phillips 1988; Bajaj 1990; Karp 1994), specific species of plants (Reuveni et al. 1993; Sahijram et al. 2003) or specific application(s) of somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981; Karp 1995; Kaeppler et al. 2000; Jain 2001).”
- Biotechnology approaches to overcome biotic and abiotic stress constraints in legumes (2006, background): “Tissue culture generates a wide range of genetic variation in plants, which can be incorporated in plant breeding programmes (Jain, 2001).”
- Factors Influencing Somatic Embryogenesis Induction and Plant Regeneration with Particular Reference to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh (2004, background): “produced plant variants (Remotti 1998; Caplan et al. 1998; Jain 2001), have been widely discussed.”
- Conservation In vitro of threatened plants—Progress in the past decade (2006, background): “Somaclonal variation is unpredictable in nature and can be both heritable (genetic) and non-heritable (epigenetic) (Jain, 2001).”
- Stress and aberrant phenotypes in vitro culture (2003, background): “Markers of specific stress responses Somaclonal variation has been reviewed by Jain et al. (1998); Jain (2001).”
- Achievements and Challenges in Legume Breeding for Pest and Disease Resistance (2015, methodology): “Tissue culture, such as callus cultivation, organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis, has the capacity to generate genetic variation in plants by inducing active transposition of retrotransposons, changes in DNA methylation profile or other spontaneous mutations (Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981; Jain, 200”
- In vitro Plant Propagation: A Review (2011, background): “There are advantages and disadvantages of somatic embryogenesis in large-scale plant multiplication (Jain, 2001).”
- Somaclonal Variation in Tissue Culture: A Case Study with Olive (2012, background): “However, there is an increasing body of evidence that indicates that in embryogenic cultures, selection in favour of ‘normal cells’ does not always take place during development and that growth of mutant cells can occur as well, which can induce variability in the cultures [36].”
- Date palm biotechnology: current status and prospective - an overview. (2012, background): “The major concern with this approach is somaclonal variation that is dependent on various factors including genotype, explants, plant growth regulators (Jain, 2001).”
- Molecular and genetic analyses of transgenic plants: Considerations and approaches (2002, background): “It is well established that the process of tissue culture could generate both epigenetic and heritable variation (somaclonal variation) [6,7].”