Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa-evolutionary versus cladistic classifications

By E. Hörandl. 2006

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f958bf3ac3911d4f0776770e1fb71aa09f73a49e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Hörandl
2. Khatere Emadzade
3. T. Stuessy
4. C. Lehnebach
5. Peter J. Lockhart
6. J. Fuerst

Citations in the corpus

• Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification (2010, background): “Most importantly, diversification processes leading to speciation hardly ever affect a species as a whole, but usually just groups of populations within a species (Hörandl, 2006).”
• A molecular phylogeny, morphology and classification of genera of Ranunculeae (Ranunculaceae) (2010, background): “We do not regard the morphological and genetic divergence of R. apiifolius as strong enough for a monotypic genus which would leave Ranunculus s.str. as a paraphyletic taxon (see discussion in Hörandl, 2006, 2007, 2010; Stuessy & König, 2008).”