Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics

By V. Haser. 2005

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f94e3d7331653bd0e9fc623b369cd8edf2589b5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. John A. Barnden
2. Paul J Silvia

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory (2011, background): “…that these issues make CMT difficult, if not impossible, to potentially falsify (Murphy, 1996; Vervaeke & Kennedy, 1996), particularly in regard to the circularity of the theory (Haser, 2005; and for an analysis of what is required to decide if CMT is circular or not, see Kertesz & Rakosi, 2009).”
• Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery (2010, background): “We briefly consider several other issues, including the question of whether metaphor and metonymy interact di¤erently with some postulated structure of domains, frames, idealized cognitive models, or other compartmentalizations of conceptual information.”