The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning
By Michael R. Waldmann. 2017
Subfields: Causal Inference & Discovery, Philosophy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Causal Inference & Discovery
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Giambattista Parascandolo
- Niki Kilbertus
- Nicholas A. Roy
- Felix Hill
- James L. McClelland
- Jane X. Wang
- Chen Yan
In Philosophy
- Felix Hill
- James L. McClelland
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jane X. Wang
- Andrew Kyle Lampinen
- Adam Santoro
- Ishita Dasgupta
- Stephanie C. Y. Chan
Citations in the corpus
- Generalization in anti-causal learning (2018, background): “It has been conjectured that humans internally build powerful causal models for simulations and approximate physical mechanisms through intuitive theories (Krynski and Tenenbaum, 2007; Waldmann et al., 2006; Hamrick et al., 2011; Battaglia et al., 2013; Gerstenberg and Tenenbaum, 2017).”
- Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives (2020, background): “…recent work has demonstrated that the successor representation model from the RL literature (Dayan, 1993) may provide a more accurate model to reflect the way humans balance their use of both model-based and model-free learning (Momennejad, Russek, Cheong, Botvinick, Daw, and Gershman, 2017).”
- Tell me why! - Explanations support learning of relational and causal structure (2021, background): “Causality: Humans focus on causal structure, even as children (Gopnik et al., 1999; Gopnik and Sobel, 2000), and our causal understanding is closely linked to explanations (Lombrozo and Vasilyeva, 2017).”
- Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure (2021, background): “Causality: Humans focus on causal structure, even as children (Gopnik et al., 1999; Gopnik & Sobel, 2000), and our causal understanding is closely linked to explanations (Lombrozo & Vasilyeva, 2017).”