On the accuracy of turbulence models for CFD simulations of vertical axis wind turbines

By A. Rezaeiha, H. Montazeri, B. Blocken. Energy, 2019

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A comparative analysis of seven commonly-used eddy-viscosity turbulence models for CFD simulations of VAWTs is presented. The models include one- to four-equations, namely the Spalart-Allmaras (SA), RNG k-e, realizable k-e, SST k-ω, SST k-ω with an additional intermittency transition model (SSTI), k-kl-ω and transition SST (TSST) k-ω models. In addition, the inviscid modeling is included in the comparison. The evaluation is based on validation with three sets of experiments for three VAWTs with different geometrical characteristics operating in a wide range of operational conditions, from dynamic stall to optimal regime and to highly-rotational flow regime. The focus is on the turbine wake, the turbine power performance, and the blade aerodynamics. High-fidelity incompressible unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations are employed. The extensive analysis reveals high sensitivity of the simulation results to the turbulence model. This is especially the case for the turbine power coefficient CP. The results show that the inviscid, SA, RNG k-e, realizable k-e and k-kl-ω models clearly fail in reproducing the aerodynamic performance of VAWTs. Only the SST model variants (SST k-ω, SSTI and TSST) are capable of exhibiting reasonable agreement with all the experimental data sets, where the transitional SST k-ω versions (SSTI and TSST) are recommended as the models of choice especially in the transitional flow regime.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f934c9b014e7738dc24aee14eceee7016f15c0ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. H. Montazeri
2. A. Rezaeiha
3. Sadra Sahebzadeh
4. B. Blocken
5. Carlo Gualtieri

In Computational Mechanics

1. H. Montazeri
2. A. Rezaeiha
3. Sadra Sahebzadeh
4. B. Blocken

In Environmental Engineering

1. H. Montazeri
2. A. Rezaeiha
3. Sadra Sahebzadeh
4. B. Blocken
5. Carlo Gualtieri

Citations in the corpus

• Towards optimal layout design of vertical-axis wind-turbine farms: Double rotor arrangements (2020, methodology): “The computational settings are based on the best-practice guidelines for accurate CFD simulation of VAWTs [28,31,32,46,47].”
• CFD analysis of dynamic stall on vertical axis wind turbines using Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS): Comparison against URANS and hybrid RANS/LES (2019, methodology): “The TSST turbulence model is selected based on a previous detailed comparison of the predictions of URANS simulations of VAWTs using different turbulence models [83].”