A Systematic Review on Model Watermarking for Neural Networks
By Franziska Boenisch. 2020
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Machine learning (ML) models are applied in an increasing variety of domains. The availability of large amounts of data and computational resources encourages the development of ever more complex and valuable models. These models are considered the intellectual property of the legitimate parties who have trained them, which makes their protection against stealing, illegitimate redistribution, and unauthorized application an urgent need. Digital watermarking presents a strong mechanism for marking model ownership and, thereby, offers protection against those threats. This work presents a taxonomy identifying and analyzing different classes of watermarking schemes for ML models. It introduces a unified threat model to allow structured reasoning on and comparison of the effectiveness of watermarking methods in different scenarios. Furthermore, it systematizes desired security requirements and attacks against ML model watermarking. Based on that framework, representative literature from the field is surveyed to illustrate the taxonomy. Finally, shortcomings and general limitations of existing approaches are discussed, and an outlook on future research directions is given.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability, Privacy & Security, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Longo Luca
- Jonas Geiping
- Yuxin Wen
- Irene Solaiman
- Jonathan Katz
- Tom Goldstein
- John Kirchenbauer
- Ian Miers
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Longo Luca
- Yuxin Wen
- Irene Solaiman
- Jonathan Katz
- Tom Goldstein
- John Kirchenbauer
- Ian Miers
- Mario Brcic
In Privacy & Security
In Signal Processing
- Yuxin Wen
- Irene Solaiman
- Jonathan Katz
- Tom Goldstein
- John Kirchenbauer
- Ian Miers
- Longo Luca
- Jonas Geiping
Citations in the corpus
- The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations (2023, background): “Different approaches to watermarking can be deployed for different needs, from the embedding method to easily determine whether an output is synthetic to linking watermarks to a model owner’s identity for authentication purposes [14].”
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directions (2023, background): “On the topic of plagiarism detection, efforts have been made recently to determine whether the content produced by AI models is artificially generated, proposing the inclusion of tailored tokens, for example, watermarking [278], in the produced content [279].”
- A Watermark for Large Language Models (2023, methodology): “This would not be used to watermark model output (as in this work), but to defend against model stealing (Adi et al., 2018; Boenisch, 2021).”