Point spread function mapping with parallel imaging techniques and high acceleration factors: Fast, robust, and flexible method for echo‐planar imaging distortion correction
By Maxim Zaitsev, Jürgen Hennig, Oliver Speck. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f911c8984f14444455c9bfedff4f5b2698bac5ce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Chloe Hutton
- Ralf Deichmann
- Oliver Josephs
- Marco Reisert
- Felix Blankenburg
- Dirk Ostwald
- Andreas Horn
Citations in the corpus
- The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain (2014, positive): “For both the fMRI and the diffusion weighted data, motion and distortion correction were applied during image reconstruction by using a previously acquired reference scan (Zaitsev et al., 2004).”
- Optimal EPI parameters for reduction of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses: A whole-brain analysis at 3 T and 1.5 T (2006, background): “…(e.g., Andersson et al., 2001; Bowtell et al., 1994; Hutton et al., 2002; Jezzard and Balaban, 1995; Sutton et al., 2004; Weiskopf et al., 2005b; Zaitsev et al., 2004), signal dropouts have often compromised fMRI studies of the inferior frontal, the medial temporal and the inferior temporal…”
- Strong Evidence for Pattern Separation in Human Dentate Gyrus (2016, methodology): “EPI volumes were distortion corrected using a point spread function mapping method (Zaitsev et al., 2004) and motion corrected during the online reconstruction. fMRI data analyses Univariate analysis. fMRI data preprocessing and statistical modeling was done using SPM8 (Wellcome Trust Centre for…”
- Lead-DBS: A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations (2015, neutral): “Factors that may influence “correctness” of the electrode model are, among others, distortion of MR imaging (Zaitsev et al., 2004), susceptibility artifacts from the DBS lead in post-operative MR (Schönecker et al., 2009) and accuracy of the normalization process, i.e. the co-registration to a…”