Getting the measure of fuel poverty: final report of the Fuel Poverty Review
By J. Hills. 2012
515 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f90a2a2cc8f9b1055526d1c7ac4ddf35f34c7fa3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Stefan Bouzarovski
- Sergio Tirado Herrero
- Katharina Drescher
- N. Simcock
- Manuel Llorca
- João Gouveia
- C. Snell
- R. Gillard
Citations in the corpus
- Financial crisis and energy consumption: A household survey in Greece (2013, background): “[5] Hill, J.”
- Price and income elasticities of residential energy demand in Germany (2017, methodology): “This implies that the OECD scale should not be applied to generate figures of energy expenditure ’per head’ as suggested by Hills (2012) because such an approach would yield inaccurate figures.”
- Objective vs. subjective fuel poverty and self-assessed health (2020, background): “It can be argued that objective measures of fuel poverty may be more accurate than subjective measures (Hills, 2012; Charlier and Legendre, 2016).”
- Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison (2017, unknown): “Following growing criticism of this de fi nition (Liddell et al., 2012; Moore, 2012), in 2010 the government commissioned an independent review (Hills, 2011, 2012).”
- Gender and energy: domestic inequities reconsidered (2019, background): “Gendered energy poverty in the Global North: setting a new agenda The vast majority of the energy poverty literature in the Global North does not even briefly mention or discuss gender (notably, this is the case for review articles and reports e.g. Chesshire Lehmann Fund, 2016; Hills, 2012).”
- Fuel poverty in the European Union: a concept in need of definition? (2016, background): “Furthermore, consensus exists that fuel poverty is distinct from income poverty (Boardman, 2010; Hills, 2012), being caused primarily by poor energy efficiency and availability of affordable energy carriers.”
- A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary (2015, background): “’s [94] Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index (MEPI) in the case of energy poverty; and affordability, thermal comfort and Hills’ [103] Low Income High Cost (LIHC) measure in the case of fuel poverty.”
- Energy poverty indicators: A critical review of methods (2017, methodology): “Rates and indicators are overwhelmingly expressed in number or percentage of households.(5,7,12,21,22,26,30,33,41,56,59,63) This is consistent with a fundamental assumption in the energy poverty and related domestic energy use literature that take households – not individuals – as the key microunit ”
- Advancing an energy justice perspective of fuel poverty: Household vulnerability and domestic retrofit policy in the United Kingdom (2017, background): “In a just world these differences would be recognised and the costs of energy provision adjusted accordingly (see: [45]).”
- Measuring Fuel Poverty: General Considerations and Application to German Household Data (2013, unknown): “As proposed by Hills (2012), the poverty gap measure (FGT measure with 1) could be used.”